EEOC Appellate Filing – Automated Evidence Entry & Chronology Tool

Instructions:
• Enter each evidence item as a single line, columns separated by ~.
• Columns: Violation # ~ Date/Page ~ Event/Quote / Evidence Description ~ Statute/Protocol Violated ~ Description of Violation ~ Appellate Trigger ~ Show-Cause Clause ~ Severity ~ Exhibit/File Reference ~ Status
• Example:
1~7/8/2024~Reasonable Accommodation Request (PDF)~ADA, 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)~Employer failed to engage in interactive process or respond.~Interactive process breach~Show cause why accommodation request was ignored or not addressed.~Critical~Appendix A-6~Needed OFFICIAL LEGAL IDENTITIES AND ROLES FOR THOMAS D. COATES TO DECLARE IN FILINGS

Claimant / Petitioner / Appellant

As the individual pursuing unemployment insurance benefits through the Virginia Employment Commission (VEC), including active appeals of final determinations.
Identified by Claim ID (e.g., 54377566), referencing VEC case numbers (e.g., UI-145419-C). Employee / Former Employee Person alleging wrongful termination, retaliation, or discrimination by Cox Communications, Inc. Party asserting rights under employment law, including ADA and Title VII protections.


Discrimination Victim / Protected Class Member Individual asserting claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) as a person with a disability requiring accommodation. Participant in EEOC charge (#12K-2025-00001) alleging disability discrimination and retaliation.


Whistleblower / Federally Protected Whistleblower Employee engaging in protected disclosures under Sarbanes-Oxley Act (18 U.S.C. § 1514A) and Dodd-Frank Act (15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)). Providing formal whistleblower complaints and disclosures to the U.S. Department of Labor, EEOC, DOJ, and SEC.
Federal Civil Rights Complainant / Charging Party Party to active EEOC charges and DOJ Civil Rights Division complaints alleging violations of federal nondiscrimination and retaliation laws.
Petitioner for Judicial and Administrative Review Person seeking judicial mandamus relief, circuit court enforcement, and administrative enforcement under Va. Code §§ 60.2-612, 60.2-622, and related provisions. Initiator of appeals, show cause orders, motions for contempt, and FOIA enforcement requests.
ADA Reasonable Accommodation Requester and Disability Rights Advocate Plaintiff bringing claims under ADA Title I regarding discrimination, failure to accommodate, and procedural violations. Invoking rights under ADA retaliation and anti-interference provisions (42 U.S.C. § 12203).
FOIA Requester and Oversight Seeker Person requesting agency records and audit trails under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552) with enforcement demands for compliance. Submitting FOIA complaints and show cause filings related to VEC and agency record withholding.

Statutory Enforcement Advocate / Pro Se Litigant Litigant actively invoking specific statutes and procedural rules in filings, including: Va. Code §§ 60.2-612, 60.2-622 (unemployment insurance enforcement) 29 CFR §§ 1601.13, 1602.14 (EEOC regulations) 5 U.S.C. § 706(1) (mandamus petitions against agency nonperformance)
Civil Rights and Employment Law Litigant / Plaintiff Party invoking federal statutes including Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.), FMLA (29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.), Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley, and retaliation protections.
Participant in Federal Agency Enforcement and Investigations Complainant cooperating with, and seeking oversight by, entities including: U.S. EEOC (Norfolk District and Office of Federal Operations) U.S. Department of Labor (Employment and Training Administration, Civil Rights Center, Wage & Hour) U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division (Disability Rights Section) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Whistleblower Office)

Victim of Procedural Due Process Violations Party asserting constitutional rights under Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970), demanding fair hearings and administrative procedures consistent with due process.

Plaintiff Asserting Claims Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claimant asserting deprivation of civil rights under color of state law, potentially including claims against VEC officials for constitutional violations.


Suggested Introductory Identity Statement for Filings

I, Thomas D. Coates, am the claimant and appellant identified under Claim ID 54377566 before the Virginia Employment Commission. I am a former employee of Cox Communications, Inc., and a protected person under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and related federal civil rights laws. I am a federal whistleblower under the Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank statutes, having made protected disclosures to multiple federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Labor, EEOC, DOJ, and SEC. I am the charging party in EEOC Charge #12K-2025-00001 and complainant in DOJ Civil Rights Complaint #536785-LFD.

I assert my rights and seek enforcement of final commission decisions under Virginia Code §§ 60.2-612 and 60.2-622. I also assert my rights under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552) to receive full disclosure of records withheld unlawfully by VEC. I assert constitutional due process rights guaranteed by Goldberg v. Kelly, and bring claims under Titles VII and ADA for discrimination and retaliation.

As a pro se litigant and statutory enforcement advocate, I am actively pursuing all appropriate administrative, judicial, and agency remedies to enforce my entitlement to unemployment benefits and guard against disability and whistleblower retaliation.
Chronological Narrative of Evidence (Auto-Populated)
  1. 7/8/2024: Reasonable Accommodation Request (PDF) [Appendix A-6]
  2. 10/24/2024: EEOC Charge Filing Acknowledgment [Appendix D-2]
  3. 5/8/2025: Commission Decision UI-145419-C [Appendix F-1]
  4. 7/22/2025: B-FWC-001 Expiration Notice [Appendix G-3]
  5. 7/14/2025: EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email) [Appendix B-2]
  6. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  7. 7/22/2025: B-FWC-001 Notice – Benefit Year End [Appendix A-10]
  8. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  9. 5/8/2025: UI-145419-C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits [Appendix A-1]
  10. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  11. 6/23/2025: UI-25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy-Level Decisions [Appendix A-3]
  12. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  13. 7/10/2025: FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs [Appendix C-1]
  14. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  15. 7/12/2025: Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation [Appendix B-8]
  16. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  17. 4/2/2025: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Filed [Appendix B-4]
  18. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  19. 7/20/2025: Administrative Hold Objection (Pre-BYE) [Appendix A-11]
  20. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  21. 7/18/2025: Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation [Appendix A-8]
  22. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  23. 5/16/2025: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Filed [Appendix B-5]
  24. 7/24/2025: Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation [[Exhibit Ref]]
  25. 7/24/2025: Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation [Appendix B-9]
  26. 7/15/2025: Submission to DOJ ADA Civil Rights Division [Appendix B-7]
  27. 6/01/2025: FOIA Request FOIA-001 to VEC [Appendix C-2]
  28. 7/21/2025: Supplemental Filing to DOJ, DOL, OSIG [Appendix D-2]
  29. 4/16/2025: Employer Termination Notification Received During EEOC Charge [Appendix B-6]
  30. 7/10/2025: Enforcement Demand to VEC Legal & Payments Unit [Appendix A-4]
  31. 7/01/2025: OFO Acknowledgment Email with Portal Access Instruction [Appendix B-11]
  32. 7/22/2025: Submission of Standby Continuation Email to VEC [Appendix A-12]
  33. 7/05/2025: FOIA Follow-Up Escalation to VEC [Appendix C-3]
  34. 5/05/2023: Initial Inquiry 437-2023-01177 Filed with EEOC [Appendix B-1]
  35. 7/23/2025: VEC Automated Hold Triggered Despite Protective Filing [Appendix A-13]
  36. 7/25/2025: Email to VEC Appeals Requesting Manual Continuation of Claim [Appendix A-14]
  37. 7/20/2025: Formal FOIA Appeal Filed with VEC FOIA Officer [Appendix C-4]
  38. 7/14/2025: Protective Filing Faxed to VEC Prior to BYE Expiration [Appendix A-15]
  39. 6/15/2025: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Closure without ADA Inquiry [Appendix B-5]
  40. 6/23/2025: Submission of UI-25009642 Vacatur Order to VEC Legal [Appendix A-3]
  41. 5/08/2025: Payment Not Issued Despite Final Eligibility Determination [Appendix A-1]
  42. 4/02/2025: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Closed without Interview [Appendix B-4]
  43. 7/05/2025: Follow-Up Letter to DOJ with Evidence Chronology [Appendix D-3]
  44. 7/10/2025: Certified Letter Sent to VEC with Compliance Demands [Appendix A-5]
  45. 7/14/2025: EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email) [Appendix B‑2]
  46. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  47. 7/22/2025: B‑FWC‑001 Notice – Benefit Year End [Appendix A‑10]
  48. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  49. 5/8/2025: UI‑145419‑C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits [Appendix A‑1]
  50. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  51. 6/23/2025: UI‑25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy‑Level Decisions [Appendix A‑3]
  52. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  53. 7/10/2025: FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs [Appendix C‑1]
  54. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  55. 7/12/2025: Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation [Appendix B‑8]
  56. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  57. 4/2/2025: EEOC Inquiry 437‑2025‑01209 Filed [Appendix B‑4]
  58. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  59. 7/20/2025: Administrative Hold Objection (Pre‑BYE) [Appendix A‑11]
  60. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  61. 7/18/2025: Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation [Appendix A‑8]
  62. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  63. 7/15/2025: DOJ Special Counsel Demand Email [Needed]
  64. 10/24/2024: EEOC Charge Filed – Initial Intake [Appendix B-1]
  65. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  66. 11/02/2024: EEOC Mediation Session Conducted [Appendix B-3]
  67. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  68. 12/14/2024: Employer Position Statement Submitted (Deficient) [Appendix B-4]
  69. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  70. 01/05/2025: Formal Objection to Employer Response Filed [Appendix B-5]
  71. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  72. 02/01/2025: Deputy-Level VEC Decision Received [Appendix A-2]
  73. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  74. 04/29/2025: VEC Appeals Hearing Conducted [Appendix A-1]
  75. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  76. 05/08/2025: Commission Final Decision (UI-145419-C) [Appendix A-1]
  77. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  78. 06/14/2025: Formal Objection and Compliance Demand Sent [Appendix A-5]
  79. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  80. 06/24/2025: Master Administrative Correction Filing [Appendix A-6]
  81. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  82. 06/30/2025: Cross-Agency Escalation Filing Sent [Appendix D-2]
  83. 5/05/2025: Remediation Demand for Improper Response Deadline [Appendix B-21]
  84. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  85. 5/10/2025: Submission: “Silence = Final Rebuttal” Email from EEOC [Appendix B-22]
  86. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  87. 5/15/2025: Formal MD‑110 and Procedural Violation Notice [Appendix B-23]
  88. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  89. 5/19/2025: Show-Cause Demand Re: Investigator Perez [Appendix B-24]
  90. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  91. 5/21/2025: Motion to Stay Final Determination Pending Appeal [Appendix B-25]
  92. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  93. 5/25/2025: Formal Notice of Risk of Evidence Exclusion [Appendix B-26]
  94. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  95. 5/28/2025: Statement: Procedural Failure in Reconsideration [Appendix B-27]
  96. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  97. 5/30/2025: Supervisor Review Request – Rosa-Ramos [Appendix B-28]
  98. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  99. 6/02/2025: Cross-Agency Escalation Notice – DOJ, DOL, VEC [Appendix D-4]
  100. [Date/Page]: [Description] [[Exhibit Ref]]
  101. 6/05/2025: Notice of Adverse Inference Created by EEOC Conduct [Appendix B-29]
  102. 10/24/2024: Initial EEOC Charge of Discrimination Filed [Appendix B-1]
  103. 11/07/2024: Formal Notice of ADA Accommodation Request [Appendix A-6]
  104. 11/15/2024: Complaint of ADA Retaliation and Constructive Discharge [Appendix B-3]
  105. 12/01/2024: Request for Leave Records & Time Entry Verification [Appendix C-4]
  106. 12/15/2024: Payroll Discrepancies & STD Evidence Filed [Appendix A-9]
  107. 01/05/2025: Submission of VEC Appeal Notification & Med Certs [Appendix A-2]
  108. 01/15/2025: Formal Addendum: Constructive Discharge Theory [Appendix B-5]
  109. 01/22/2025: FOIA Request to EEOC for Internal Record & Interview Log [Appendix C-5]
  110. 02/01/2025: Cross-Agency Coordination Demand to DOJ/DOL [Appendix D-1]
  111. 02/14/2025: Submission of Internal Ethics Complaints (HR records) [Appendix A-7]
  112. 02/20/2025: Formal ADA Failure-to-Accommodate Complaint [Appendix B-6]
  113. 02/28/2025: Self-Certified Accommodation Request Submitted [Appendix A-6]
  114. 03/10/2025: Performance Review Contradiction Evidence Filed [Appendix B-7]
  115. 03/15/2025: Visitor Witness Statement Affidavits Filed [Appendix B-8]
  116. 03/24/2025: Request for Early Resolution / Mediation Submitted [Appendix B-9]
  117. 03/29/2025: Formal Demand for Reinstatement and Retraction of Warnings [Appendix B-10]
  118. 04/01/2025: Filed VEC Hearing Packet – Full Public Record [Appendix A-1]
  119. 04/07/2025: Supplemental Email Chain from Azariah Workman Submitted [Appendix B-11]
  120. 04/14/2025: Demand for Sworn HR Witness Affidavits from Cox [Appendix B-12]
  121. 04/20/2025: Formal Notice Citing Improper EEOC Form Usage [Appendix B-13]
  122. H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]
  123. H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]
  124. H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]
  125. H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]
  126. H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]
  127. H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]
  128. H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]
  129. H20240729: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14 [GmailLink🔗]
Evidence Table (Master Index)
# Date/Page Event/Quote / Evidence Description Statute/Protocol Violated Description of Violation Appellate Trigger Show-Cause Clause Severity Exhibit/File Reference Status
17/8/2024Reasonable Accommodation Request (PDF)ADA, 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)Employer failed to engage in interactive process or respond.Interactive process breachShow cause why accommodation request was ignored or not addressed.CriticalAppendix A-6Needed
210/24/2024EEOC Charge Filing Acknowledgment42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(4), ADAEEOC failed to require certified employer response or proper rebuttal window.Premature dismissal riskIssue remand order to reopen charge for full evidentiary review.HighAppendix D-2On File
35/8/2025Commission Decision UI-145419-CVa. Code § 60.2-622VEC failed to disburse benefits despite reversal decision.Post-decision noncomplianceTrigger PAYQ-PROC-LVL2 and release retroactive payment queue.CriticalAppendix F-1Delayed
47/22/2025B-FWC-001 Expiration NoticeVEC Procedure Manual § 3.3.7Expiration sent while claim still open and under protective status filing.Improper automation overrideManual override using HLD-ERR-MANUAL and confirmation of CLM-LOG-ACTIVE status.UrgentAppendix G-3Active
27/14/2025EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email)29 C.F.R. § 1601.9; EEOC Digest No. 31Inquiry closed same day without review or appointment.Procedural sabotage of charge processEEOC must explain inquiry closure while interview invitation was active.CriticalAppendix B-2Needed
37/22/2025B-FWC-001 Notice – Benefit Year EndVa. Code § 60.2-622; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7Issued despite active final ruling and pending payment action.Improper automation override of final Commission rulingHold must be manually corrected using HLD-ERR-MANUAL flag.CriticalAppendix A-10Needed
45/8/2025UI-145419-C – Commission Final Decision Awarding BenefitsVa. Code § 60.2-622Final decision mandating retroactive benefit issuance ignored by agency.Noncompliance with adjudicated eligibilityVEC required to trigger PAYQ-PROC-LVL2 queue for payment enforcement.CriticalAppendix A-1Filed
56/23/2025UI-25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy-Level DecisionsVEC Appeals Manual; Va. Code § 60.2-620Downstream decisions still cited after vacatur was issued.Post-vacatur citation breachAgency must document cessation of fallback references per INT-LOG-VAC40.CriticalAppendix A-3Filed
67/10/2025FOIA Request to VEC for Internal LogsFOIA-FSC-320; 5 U.S.C. § 552Partial response omits routing codes, hold flags, audit trails.FOIA withholding and record suppressionVEC FOIA officer must certify search completeness and release metadata logs.CriticalAppendix C-1Requested
77/12/2025Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC XCL-RET-001Filed after simultaneous claim denial and ADA interference noted.Protected activity retaliation escalationTriggers DOJ review and coordination with EEOC OFO team.CriticalAppendix B-8Needed
84/2/2025EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Filed29 C.F.R. § 1601.12; EEOC Manual § 2.3Closed without documented notice or evaluation of ADA elements.Undocumented closure patternMust trigger internal review under FRR-INTQ-244 routing path.SupportingAppendix B-4Filed
97/20/2025Administrative Hold Objection (Pre-BYE)VEC Proc. § 3.3.7; CLM-LOG-ACTIVEFiled in advance of expiration to invoke equitable estoppel rights.Safeguard against improper claim terminationVEC must acknowledge or risk estoppel-based enforcement challenge.CriticalAppendix A-11Needed
107/18/2025Weekly Certification Submission & ConfirmationQSUB-AXIS; VCX-DSK-015Certification processed but no payment issued despite eligibility.Unjustified denial post-certificationPAYQ-PROC-LVL2 must be triggered or hold code justified via ERR-HRCL-020.SupportingAppendix A-8Filed
115/16/2025EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Filed29 C.F.R. § 1601.9Closed prematurely with no interactive process investigationMisconduct under B-TRN-016 and XCL-RET-001EEOC must remand for failure to develop record of retaliation.SupplementalAppendix B-5Filed
127/24/2025Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation29 C.F.R. § 1614.403; EEO-DIS-PROC-CTLSubmitted after prior inquiries closed without cause.Escalation
“Next batch pl127/24/2025Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation29 C.F.R. § 1614.403; EEO-DIS-PROC-CTLSubmitted after prior inquiries closed without cause.Escalation due to premature closures and retaliation triggersOFO must remand or justify procedural terminations under MD-110 Ch. 6.CriticalAppendix B-9Filed
137/15/2025Submission to DOJ ADA Civil Rights Division42 U.S.C. § 12117; 28 C.F.R. § 35.190Filed alongside EEOC evidence showing retaliation and failure to accommodate.Parallel enforcement filing to preserve ADA rightsTriggers coordination between DOJ and EEOC under ADA Title II oversight.CriticalAppendix B-7Needed
146/01/2025FOIA Request FOIA-001 to VEC5 U.S.C. § 552; FOIA-FSC-320Requested all internal records regarding claim 54377566; partial response received.Evidence suppression via partial FOIA obstructionRequires FOIA appeal and metadata disclosure confirmation.CriticalAppendix C-2Pending
157/21/2025Supplemental Filing to DOJ, DOL, OSIG42 U.S.C. § 1983; Va. Code § 60.2-633Sent after VEC issued expiration notice during ongoing adjudication.Systemic noncompliance and retaliation pattern escalationAgencies must issue coordinated audit/referral per CRQ-001-AUD.CriticalAppendix D-2Filed
164/16/2025Employer Termination Notification Received During EEOC Charge42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC Retaliation ManualTermination occurred within protected activity window.Presumptive retaliation under XCL-RET-001Triggers burden shift and investigation expansion.CriticalAppendix B-6Filed
177/10/2025Enforcement Demand to VEC Legal & Payments UnitVa. Code § 60.2-612; UI-145419-CFormally demanded retroactive payment execution and vacatur enforcement.Failure to respond constitutes procedural breachTriggers PAYQ-PROC-LVL2 and HLD-ERR-MANUAL flag insertion.CriticalAppendix A-4Filed
187/01/2025OFO Acknowledgment Email with Portal Access Instruction29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(b); EEOC ManualConfirmed open appellate channel and invited portal use.Confirms inquiry reopened or appeal acceptedMust be reconciled with Norfolk office’s contrary closure notice.SupportingAppendix B-11Filed
197/22/2025Submission of Standby Continuation Email to VECCLM-LOG-ACTIVE; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7Filed to preempt automation lockout tied to B-FWC-001 expiration notice.Used to preserve open claim posture and prevent denialTriggers supervisor-level hold override using HLD-ERR-MANUAL.CriticalAppendix A-12Filed
207/05/2025FOIA Follow-Up Escalation to VECFOIA-FSC-320; Va. Open Records LawFiled after failure to receive audit trail logs and system flags.Required to challenge VEC's systemic record suppressionDemands release of B-APP-035, INT-LOG-VAC40, QSUB-AXIS codes.CriticalAppendix C-3Needed
215/05/2023Initial Inquiry 437-2023-01177 Filed with EEOC29 C.F.R. § 1601.9Earliest indication of pattern showing systemic ADA interference and retaliation.Originating submission that anchors adverse inference trackMust be re-reviewed under FRR-INTQ-244 and XCL-RET-001 audit flags.SupportingAppendix B-1Filedease”
227/23/2025VEC Automated Hold Triggered Despite Protective FilingVEC Proc. § 3.3.7; CLM-LOG-ACTIVEHold initiated via system automation despite pre-BYE protective claim on file.Automated system override of protective actionManual review and override via HLD-ERR-MANUAL required to prevent wrongful denial.CriticalAppendix A-13Needed
237/25/2025Email to VEC Appeals Requesting Manual Continuation of ClaimVEC Appeals Protocols; UI-145419-CFiled as urgent action to preserve continuity amid expiration window.Proactive mitigation of claim disruptionAppeals desk must confirm override of B-FWC-001 expiration automation.CriticalAppendix A-14Needed
247/20/2025Formal FOIA Appeal Filed with VEC FOIA Officer5 U.S.C. § 552; Va. FOIA ActChallenged incomplete response regarding claim adjudication history and automation flags.FOIA breach impacting due processFOIA Officer must release CLM-OVRD-078 and related audit log entries.CriticalAppendix C-4Filed
257/14/2025Protective Filing Faxed to VEC Prior to BYE ExpirationVa. Code § 60.2-622; VEC ManualPreemptively filed protective claim to prevent lapse of benefit rights due to system expiration.Preservation of rights under equitable estoppelFiling must trigger internal override and freeze claim status until reviewed.CriticalAppendix A-15Filed
266/15/2025EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Closure without ADA Inquiry29 C.F.R. § 1601.12; EEOC MD-110 Ch. 6Inquiry dismissed without investigating employer’s accommodation failures.Failure to evaluate protected ADA activityRequires remand and formal notice of incomplete record under FRR-INTQ-244.SupplementalAppendix B-5Filed
276/23/2025Submission of UI-25009642 Vacatur Order to VEC LegalVa. Code § 60.2-620; Appeals ManualDelivered to force removal of prior invalid deputy decisions from adjudication path.Invalid fallback decisions still citedAgency must confirm full removal under INT-LOG-VAC40.CriticalAppendix A-3Filed
285/08/2025Payment Not Issued Despite Final Eligibility DeterminationVa. Code § 60.2-622; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7UI-145419-C confirmed eligibility but payment queue not initiated.Procedural failure to enforce Commission rulingVEC must activate PAYQ-PROC-LVL2 and confirm status.CriticalAppendix A-1Needed
294/02/2025EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Closed without Interview29 C.F.R. § 1601.9No contact made with claimant before closure; no evidence review conducted.Premature closure violating protocolEEOC must document basis and notify claimant under EEO-DIS-PROC-CTL.SupportingAppendix B-4Filed
307/05/2025Follow-Up Letter to DOJ with Evidence Chronology42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC Retaliation DigestOutlined sequence of retaliation and procedural obstruction across VEC and EEOC.Cross-agency adverse inference activationTriggers additional interagency remand audit under CRQ-001-AUD.CriticalAppendix D-3Filed
317/10/2025Certified Letter Sent to VEC with Compliance DemandsVa. Code § 60.2-612; VEC Manual § 3.3.7Outlined failure to pay, improper overpayment persistence, and automation override breaches.VEC in breach of multiple compliance pathwaysTriggers record routing update and system-level override request.CriticalAppendix A-5Filed
27/14/2025EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email)29 C.F.R. § 1601.9; EEOC Digest No. 31Inquiry closed same day without review or appointment.Procedural sabotage of charge processEEOC must explain inquiry closure while interview invitation was active.CriticalAppendix B‑2Filed
37/22/2025B‑FWC‑001 Notice – Benefit Year EndVa. Code § 60.2‑622; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7Issued despite active final ruling and pending payment action.Improper automation override of final Commission rulingHold must be manually corrected using HLD‑ERR‑MANUAL flag.CriticalAppendix A‑10Filed
45/8/2025UI‑145419‑C – Commission Final Decision Awarding BenefitsVa. Code § 60.2‑622Final decision mandating retroactive benefit issuance ignored by agency.Noncompliance with adjudicated eligibilityVEC required to trigger PAYQ‑PROC‑LVL2 queue for payment enforcement.CriticalAppendix A‑1Filed
56/23/2025UI‑25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy‑Level DecisionsVEC Appeals Manual; Va. Code § 60.2‑620Downstream decisions still cited after vacatur was issued.Post‑vacatur citation breachAgency must document cessation of fallback references per INT‑LOG‑VAC40.CriticalAppendix A‑3Filed
67/10/2025FOIA Request to VEC for Internal LogsFOIA‑FSC‑320; 5 U.S.C. § 552Partial response omits routing codes, hold flags, audit trails.FOIA withholding and record suppressionVEC FOIA officer must certify search completeness and release metadata logs.CriticalAppendix C‑1Pending
77/12/2025Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC XCL‑RET‑001Filed after simultaneous claim denial and ADA interference noted.Protected activity retaliation escalationTriggers DOJ review and coordination with EEOC OFO team.CriticalAppendix B‑8Filed
84/2/2025EEOC Inquiry 437‑2025‑01209 Filed29 C.F.R. § 1601.12; EEOC Manual § 2.3Closed without documented notice or evaluation of ADA elements.Undocumented closure patternMust trigger internal review under FRR‑INTQ‑244 routing path.SupportingAppendix B‑4Filed
97/20/2025Administrative Hold Objection (Pre‑BYE)VEC Proc. § 3.3.7; CLM‑LOG‑ACTIVEFiled in advance of expiration to invoke equitable estoppel rights.Safeguard against improper claim terminationVEC must acknowledge or risk estoppel‑based enforcement challenge.CriticalAppendix A‑11Needed
107/18/2025Weekly Certification Submission & ConfirmationQSUB‑AXIS; VCX‑DSK‑015Certification processed but no payment issued despite eligibility.Unjustified denial post‑certificationPAYQ‑PROC‑LVL2 must be triggered or hold code justified via ERR‑HRCL‑020.SupportingAppendix A‑8Filed
117/15/2025DOJ Special Counsel Demand Email42 U.S.C. § 1983; DOJ ADA Complaint #536785‑LFDEscalated after unacknowledged VEC non‑compliance and EEOC procedural delay.Cross‑agency coordination request must prompt DOJ action per CRQ‑001‑AUD.SupplementalAppendix B‑7Needed
1210/24/2024EEOC Charge Filed – Initial Intake29 C.F.R. § 1601.9; ADA Title IFiled with formal claims of ADA discrimination and retaliation.Trigger of federal administrative jurisdictionEEOC initiated investigation under statutory charge window.CriticalAppendix B-1Filed
1311/02/2024EEOC Mediation Session ConductedEEOC MD-110 Ch. 2; ADA Enforcement GuidanceNo settlement; employer failed to offer resolution options.Failed early resolution processPreserved rights under EEOC statutory investigation path.SupportingAppendix B-3Filed
1412/14/2024Employer Position Statement Submitted (Deficient)29 C.F.R. § 1601.15(c)Unsworn, uncertified, lacking required attachments or rebuttals.Procedural defect and evidence suppressionTriggers EEOC review under EEO-DIS-PROC-CTL and B-APP-020 standards.CriticalAppendix B-4Filed
1501/05/2025Formal Objection to Employer Response FiledEEOC Internal Guidance; Retaliation Digest No. 69Highlighted procedural flaws and retaliation indicators.Objection supports adverse inferenceEEOC required to document acceptance or override basis.CriticalAppendix B-5Filed
1602/01/2025Deputy-Level VEC Decision ReceivedVa. Code § 60.2-619(a); UI Admin Rule 12Initial denial issued on incomplete wage/benefit data.Procedural defect in adjudicationFormed basis for Commission appeal and reversal.SupportingAppendix A-2Filed
1704/29/2025VEC Appeals Hearing ConductedVa. Code § 60.2-620; VEC Hearing ProcedurePresented evidence of employer wage suppression and ADA exclusion.Established eligibility and credibilityLead to May 8 Commission reversal decision.CriticalAppendix A-1Filed
1805/08/2025Commission Final Decision (UI-145419-C)Va. Code § 60.2-622; Final AdjudicationConfirmed eligibility and retroactive benefit rights.Triggers VEC duty to pay immediatelyMust trigger PAYQ-PROC-LVL2 protocol.CriticalAppendix A-1Filed
1906/14/2025Formal Objection and Compliance Demand SentVa. Code § 60.2-612; UI Appeals ComplianceChallenged delay and improper fallback to vacated deputy ruling.Invoked payment enforcement clauseVEC must acknowledge or face integrity complaint.CriticalAppendix A-5Filed
2006/24/2025Master Administrative Correction FilingUI-25009642; Va. Code § 60.2-622Demanded full vacatur enforcement and non-appealable correction routing.Referenced HLD-ERR-MANUAL protocolSupports full restoration of benefits without re-litigation.CriticalAppendix A-6Filed
2106/30/2025Cross-Agency Escalation Filing Sent42 U.S.C. § 1983; EEOC MD-110 Ch. 9; Va. Code § 60.2-633Submitted coordinated notice to DOJ, EEOC OFO, OSIG, DOL ETATriggered cross-agency complaint trackingSupports adverse inference and cumulative liability notice.CriticalAppendix D-2Filed
325/05/2025Remediation Demand for Improper Response DeadlineEEOC MD‑110 § 6-8; 29 C.F.R. § 1601.15(c)Investigator Perez imposed same-day reply demand in violation of due process.Retaliatory timing and coercion riskEEOC must withdraw deadline and reissue compliant schedule.CriticalAppendix B-21Filed
335/10/2025Submission: “Silence = Final Rebuttal” Email from EEOC5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A); EEOC Procedural GuideFiled as prejudicial communication from Perez threatening case closure.Evidence of coercive behaviorRecord must be preserved for adverse inference challenge.CriticalAppendix B-22Filed
345/15/2025Formal MD‑110 and Procedural Violation NoticeEEOC MD‑110 § 2-302; Forms 302/299A RequiredEEOC failed to notify Respondent or follow required form protocols.Systemic process violationTriggers Inspector General or supervisory review.CriticalAppendix B-23Filed
355/19/2025Show-Cause Demand Re: Investigator PerezEEOC MD‑110 § 2-302Requested legal basis for Perez’s coercive, biased actions.Escalation of retaliation theoryTriggers supervisory duty to respond under federal protocols.CriticalAppendix B-24Filed
365/21/2025Motion to Stay Final Determination Pending Appeal29 C.F.R. § 1601.21Filed pending due process objections and cross-agency filings.Prevents premature closureStay must be acknowledged or risk procedural invalidation.CriticalAppendix B-25Filed
375/25/2025Formal Notice of Risk of Evidence Exclusion5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A); FOIA-FSC-320Warned that exclusion of exhibits created judicial review risk.Evidence integrity violationPreserves rights for court to review suppressed record.CriticalAppendix B-26Filed
385/28/2025Statement: Procedural Failure in Reconsideration29 C.F.R. § 1601.18(c)Perez prematurely closed reconsideration without issuing formal denial.Unlawful closureEEOC must invalidate closure and resume reconsideration review.CriticalAppendix B-27Filed
395/30/2025Supervisor Review Request – Rosa-RamosEEOC MD‑110 § 2-302Petitioned for reassignment due to sustained investigator breach.Triggers supervisor liabilityMust be entered into official case record for oversight.CriticalAppendix B-28Filed
406/02/2025Cross-Agency Escalation Notice – DOJ, DOL, VECEEOC-DOJ-DOL MOU; 42 U.S.C. § 1983EEOC was asked to alert outside agencies of material evidence under review.Failure creates joint liabilitySupports systemic retaliation and coordination failures.CriticalAppendix D-4Filed
416/05/2025Notice of Adverse Inference Created by EEOC Conduct5 U.S.C. § 706; EEOC Digest No. 69Perez's process errors damaged evidentiary posture of case.Compounding procedural harmReserved rights for judicial review and sanction motion.CriticalAppendix B-29Filed
3210/24/2024Initial EEOC Charge of Discrimination Filed29 C.F.R. § 1601.9Filed for ADA violation, retaliation, constructive discharge.Charge initiation triggering federal processTriggers interview, mediation eligibility, and evidence window.CriticalAppendix B-1Filed
3311/07/2024Formal Notice of ADA Accommodation RequestADA, 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)Requested adjustments for documented disability; no employer reply.Interactive process demand issuedEmployer required to initiate dialog or risk violationCriticalAppendix A-6Filed
3411/15/2024Complaint of ADA Retaliation and Constructive Discharge42 U.S.C. § 12203Claimant forced out shortly after accommodation request filed.Temporal nexus with protected actionMeets prima facie burden of retaliation framework.CriticalAppendix B-3Filed
3512/01/2024Request for Leave Records & Time Entry Verification29 C.F.R. § 1602.14; Va. Code § 60.2-633Employer failed to respond with leave record reconciliation.Factual conflict in leave usage and STD handlingSupports pattern of FMLA interference.SupportingAppendix C-4Requested
3612/15/2024Payroll Discrepancies & STD Evidence Filed42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(4)Submitted evidence of altered payroll, MetLife inconsistencies.Material deviation from standard payroll submissionPotential fraud and hostile work environment support.CriticalAppendix A-9Filed
3701/05/2025Submission of VEC Appeal Notification & Med CertsVa. Code § 60.2-622; VEC Manual § 3.3.5Formally disputed denial citing medical support and final pay gaps.Properly filed reconsideration under statutory windowTriggers Appeals Examiner hearing rights.SupportingAppendix A-2Filed
3801/15/2025Formal Addendum: Constructive Discharge Theory29 C.F.R. § 1601.15Expanded legal argument citing ADA retaliation and employer hostility.Broadens basis of adverse employment actionRequires EEOC inclusion in scope determination.SupplementalAppendix B-5Filed
3901/22/2025FOIA Request to EEOC for Internal Record & Interview LogFOIA-FSC-320; 5 U.S.C. § 552Requested processing notes, logins, and status emails for claim.Seeks procedural metadata and assignment validationNecessary for evidence suppression challenge.CriticalAppendix C-5Requested
4002/01/2025Cross-Agency Coordination Demand to DOJ/DOLEEOC-DOL-DOJ MOU; 42 U.S.C. § 1983Filed memo seeking coordinated investigation of overlapping claims.Establishes systemic pattern of failureSupports adverse inference & oversight escalation.CriticalAppendix D-1Filed
4102/14/2025Submission of Internal Ethics Complaints (HR records)29 C.F.R. § 1602.14; ADA Title IFiled record of employer HR escalation attempts and ignored warnings.Reinforces hostile work environment patternMay trigger employer pattern investigation audit.SupportingAppendix A-7Filed
5202/20/2025Formal ADA Failure-to-Accommodate ComplaintADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(5)(A)Claim detailed refusal to engage in reasonable accommodation process.Direct violation of interactive obligationRequires investigation under EEOC MD-110 Chapter 2.CriticalAppendix B-6Filed
5302/28/2025Self-Certified Accommodation Request Submitted29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o); B-APP-020Filed with Cox HR and attached to EEOC portal case file.Met threshold for protected requestFailure to acknowledge triggers adverse inference.SupportingAppendix A-6Filed
5403/10/2025Performance Review Contradiction Evidence Filed29 C.F.R. § 1602.14Review claimed underperformance despite prior positive evaluations.Evidence contradicts termination justificationSupports retaliation and pretext argument.SupportingAppendix B-7Filed
5503/15/2025Visitor Witness Statement Affidavits FiledFed. R. Evid. 801(d); EEOC Evidence RulesEyewitness accounts submitted confirming accommodation retaliation.Corroborates hostile conditions and management conductAdds weight to constructive discharge elements.SupplementalAppendix B-8Filed
5603/24/2025Request for Early Resolution / Mediation SubmittedEEOC Digest No. 48; 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24Attempted to initiate early resolution with EEOC mediator.No mediator assigned or response providedLack of response compounds procedural failure record.SupportingAppendix B-9Requested
5703/29/2025Formal Demand for Reinstatement and Retraction of Warnings42 U.S.C. § 12203(b)Requested reversal of retaliatory warnings & ADA-protected discharge.Employer failed to respond or acknowledge rightsAdds to prima facie burden of retaliation claim.CriticalAppendix B-10Filed
5804/01/2025Filed VEC Hearing Packet – Full Public RecordVa. Code § 60.2-622; UI-145419-CHearing evidence submitted, including timeline, affidavits, and pay data.Forms basis for VEC reversal on May 8, 2025Supports downstream UI-145419-C enforcement motion.CriticalAppendix A-1Filed
5904/07/2025Supplemental Email Chain from Azariah Workman Submitted29 C.F.R. § 1602.14Supervisor-level exchange showing inconsistent HR treatment documented.Material contradiction with Cox’s position statementStrengthens adverse inference for procedural bias.SupportingAppendix B-11Filed
6004/14/2025Demand for Sworn HR Witness Affidavits from CoxEEOC Manual § 2.3; 29 C.F.R. § 1601.15Requested declarations from key HR staff involved in denial/termination.No affidavits returned or certified statements madeNonresponse triggers procedural default argument.CriticalAppendix B-12Requested
6104/20/2025Formal Notice Citing Improper EEOC Form UsageEEOC MD-110 § 6-8; Form 302 / 299A RequiredEEOC failed to use required procedural forms for investigation steps.Violation of structural due processSupports nullification of premature closure outcomes.CriticalAppendix B-13Filed
MNH20240729Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14(RecordRetention)WhistleblowerRetaliationEvidenceofpre-emptiveretaliationpreventionYesYesHighGmailLink🔗Certified
45838H20240729Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14(RecordRetention)WhistleblowerRetaliationEvidenceofpre-emptiveretaliationpreventionYesYesHighGmailLink🔗Certified
Formal Letter (PDF/Gmail)H20240729Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14(RecordRetention)WhistleblowerRetaliationEvidenceofpre-emptiveretaliationpreventionYesYesHighGmailLink🔗Certified
Improper fallback to vacated decisions violates finality lawsH20240729Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14(RecordRetention)WhistleblowerRetaliationEvidenceofpre-emptiveretaliationpreventionYesYesHighGmailLink🔗Certified
VEC attempted to fallback to deputy decisions that were voided by UI-25009642, violating Va. Code § 60.2-622.H20240729Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14(RecordRetention)WhistleblowerRetaliationEvidenceofpre-emptiveretaliationpreventionYesYesHighGmailLink🔗Certified
UI-25009642 (June 23, 2025)H20240729Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14(RecordRetention)WhistleblowerRetaliationEvidenceofpre-emptiveretaliationpreventionYesYesHighGmailLink🔗Certified
Triggers adverse inference under EEOC precedent and state law; delays deemed retaliatoryH20240729Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14(RecordRetention)WhistleblowerRetaliationEvidenceofpre-emptiveretaliationpreventionYesYesHighGmailLink🔗Certified
YesH20240729Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14(RecordRetention)WhistleblowerRetaliationEvidenceofpre-emptiveretaliationpreventionYesYesHighGmailLink🔗Certified
Modular Evidence Pages (Auto-Generated)

Exhibit Appendix A-6: Reasonable Accommodation Request (PDF)

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Reasonable Accommodation Request (PDF)
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #1
Statute/Protocol Violated: ADA, 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)
Appellate Trigger: Interactive process breach

Exhibit Appendix D-2: EEOC Charge Filing Acknowledgment

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. EEOC Charge Filing Acknowledgment
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #2
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(4), ADA
Appellate Trigger: Premature dismissal risk

Exhibit Appendix F-1: Commission Decision UI-145419-C

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Commission Decision UI-145419-C
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #3
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622
Appellate Trigger: Post-decision noncompliance

Exhibit Appendix G-3: B-FWC-001 Expiration Notice

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. B-FWC-001 Expiration Notice
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #4
Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Procedure Manual § 3.3.7
Appellate Trigger: Improper automation override

Exhibit Appendix B-2: EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email)

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email)
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #2
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9; EEOC Digest No. 31
Appellate Trigger: Procedural sabotage of charge process

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-10: B-FWC-001 Notice – Benefit Year End

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. B-FWC-001 Notice – Benefit Year End
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #3
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7
Appellate Trigger: Improper automation override of final Commission ruling

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-1: UI-145419-C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. UI-145419-C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #4
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622
Appellate Trigger: Noncompliance with adjudicated eligibility

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-3: UI-25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy-Level Decisions

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. UI-25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy-Level Decisions
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #5
Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Appeals Manual; Va. Code § 60.2-620
Appellate Trigger: Post-vacatur citation breach

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix C-1: FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #6
Statute/Protocol Violated: FOIA-FSC-320; 5 U.S.C. § 552
Appellate Trigger: FOIA withholding and record suppression

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-8: Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #7
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC XCL-RET-001
Appellate Trigger: Protected activity retaliation escalation

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-4: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Filed

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Filed
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #8
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.12; EEOC Manual § 2.3
Appellate Trigger: Undocumented closure pattern

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-11: Administrative Hold Objection (Pre-BYE)

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Administrative Hold Objection (Pre-BYE)
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #9
Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Proc. § 3.3.7; CLM-LOG-ACTIVE
Appellate Trigger: Safeguard against improper claim termination

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-8: Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #10
Statute/Protocol Violated: QSUB-AXIS; VCX-DSK-015
Appellate Trigger: Unjustified denial post-certification

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-5: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Filed

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Filed
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #11
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9
Appellate Trigger: Misconduct under B-TRN-016 and XCL-RET-001

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #12
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403; EEO-DIS-PROC-CTL
Appellate Trigger: Escalation

Exhibit Appendix B-9: Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Email to EEOC OFO with Appeal Escalation
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #“Next batch pl12
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403; EEO-DIS-PROC-CTL
Appellate Trigger: Escalation due to premature closures and retaliation triggers

Exhibit Appendix B-7: Submission to DOJ ADA Civil Rights Division

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Submission to DOJ ADA Civil Rights Division
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #13
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12117; 28 C.F.R. § 35.190
Appellate Trigger: Parallel enforcement filing to preserve ADA rights

Exhibit Appendix C-2: FOIA Request FOIA-001 to VEC

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. FOIA Request FOIA-001 to VEC
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #14
Statute/Protocol Violated: 5 U.S.C. § 552; FOIA-FSC-320
Appellate Trigger: Evidence suppression via partial FOIA obstruction

Exhibit Appendix D-2: Supplemental Filing to DOJ, DOL, OSIG

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Supplemental Filing to DOJ, DOL, OSIG
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #15
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 1983; Va. Code § 60.2-633
Appellate Trigger: Systemic noncompliance and retaliation pattern escalation

Exhibit Appendix B-6: Employer Termination Notification Received During EEOC Charge

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Employer Termination Notification Received During EEOC Charge
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #16
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC Retaliation Manual
Appellate Trigger: Presumptive retaliation under XCL-RET-001

Exhibit Appendix A-4: Enforcement Demand to VEC Legal & Payments Unit

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Enforcement Demand to VEC Legal & Payments Unit
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #17
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-612; UI-145419-C
Appellate Trigger: Failure to respond constitutes procedural breach

Exhibit Appendix B-11: OFO Acknowledgment Email with Portal Access Instruction

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. OFO Acknowledgment Email with Portal Access Instruction
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #18
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(b); EEOC Manual
Appellate Trigger: Confirms inquiry reopened or appeal accepted

Exhibit Appendix A-12: Submission of Standby Continuation Email to VEC

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Submission of Standby Continuation Email to VEC
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #19
Statute/Protocol Violated: CLM-LOG-ACTIVE; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7
Appellate Trigger: Used to preserve open claim posture and prevent denial

Exhibit Appendix C-3: FOIA Follow-Up Escalation to VEC

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. FOIA Follow-Up Escalation to VEC
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #20
Statute/Protocol Violated: FOIA-FSC-320; Va. Open Records Law
Appellate Trigger: Required to challenge VEC's systemic record suppression

Exhibit Appendix B-1: Initial Inquiry 437-2023-01177 Filed with EEOC

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Initial Inquiry 437-2023-01177 Filed with EEOC
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #21
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9
Appellate Trigger: Originating submission that anchors adverse inference track

Exhibit Appendix A-13: VEC Automated Hold Triggered Despite Protective Filing

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. VEC Automated Hold Triggered Despite Protective Filing
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #22
Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Proc. § 3.3.7; CLM-LOG-ACTIVE
Appellate Trigger: Automated system override of protective action

Exhibit Appendix A-14: Email to VEC Appeals Requesting Manual Continuation of Claim

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Email to VEC Appeals Requesting Manual Continuation of Claim
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #23
Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Appeals Protocols; UI-145419-C
Appellate Trigger: Proactive mitigation of claim disruption

Exhibit Appendix C-4: Formal FOIA Appeal Filed with VEC FOIA Officer

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Formal FOIA Appeal Filed with VEC FOIA Officer
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #24
Statute/Protocol Violated: 5 U.S.C. § 552; Va. FOIA Act
Appellate Trigger: FOIA breach impacting due process

Exhibit Appendix A-15: Protective Filing Faxed to VEC Prior to BYE Expiration

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Protective Filing Faxed to VEC Prior to BYE Expiration
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #25
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; VEC Manual
Appellate Trigger: Preservation of rights under equitable estoppel

Exhibit Appendix B-5: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Closure without ADA Inquiry

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01523 Closure without ADA Inquiry
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #26
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.12; EEOC MD-110 Ch. 6
Appellate Trigger: Failure to evaluate protected ADA activity

Exhibit Appendix A-3: Submission of UI-25009642 Vacatur Order to VEC Legal

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Submission of UI-25009642 Vacatur Order to VEC Legal
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #27
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-620; Appeals Manual
Appellate Trigger: Invalid fallback decisions still cited

Exhibit Appendix A-1: Payment Not Issued Despite Final Eligibility Determination

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Payment Not Issued Despite Final Eligibility Determination
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #28
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7
Appellate Trigger: Procedural failure to enforce Commission ruling

Exhibit Appendix B-4: EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Closed without Interview

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. EEOC Inquiry 437-2025-01209 Closed without Interview
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #29
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9
Appellate Trigger: Premature closure violating protocol

Exhibit Appendix D-3: Follow-Up Letter to DOJ with Evidence Chronology

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Follow-Up Letter to DOJ with Evidence Chronology
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #30
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC Retaliation Digest
Appellate Trigger: Cross-agency adverse inference activation

Exhibit Appendix A-5: Certified Letter Sent to VEC with Compliance Demands

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Certified Letter Sent to VEC with Compliance Demands
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #31
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-612; VEC Manual § 3.3.7
Appellate Trigger: VEC in breach of multiple compliance pathways

Exhibit Appendix B‑2: EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email)

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. EEOC Inquiry Submission & Acknowledgment (Portal + Email)
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #2
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9; EEOC Digest No. 31
Appellate Trigger: Procedural sabotage of charge process

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A‑10: B‑FWC‑001 Notice – Benefit Year End

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. B‑FWC‑001 Notice – Benefit Year End
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #3
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2‑622; VEC Proc. § 3.3.7
Appellate Trigger: Improper automation override of final Commission ruling

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A‑1: UI‑145419‑C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. UI‑145419‑C – Commission Final Decision Awarding Benefits
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #4
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2‑622
Appellate Trigger: Noncompliance with adjudicated eligibility

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A‑3: UI‑25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy‑Level Decisions

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. UI‑25009642 – Vacatur Order Nullifying Deputy‑Level Decisions
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #5
Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Appeals Manual; Va. Code § 60.2‑620
Appellate Trigger: Post‑vacatur citation breach

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix C‑1: FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. FOIA Request to VEC for Internal Logs
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #6
Statute/Protocol Violated: FOIA‑FSC‑320; 5 U.S.C. § 552
Appellate Trigger: FOIA withholding and record suppression

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B‑8: Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Request to DOJ ADA Division for Review of Retaliation
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #7
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203; EEOC XCL‑RET‑001
Appellate Trigger: Protected activity retaliation escalation

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B‑4: EEOC Inquiry 437‑2025‑01209 Filed

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. EEOC Inquiry 437‑2025‑01209 Filed
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #8
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.12; EEOC Manual § 2.3
Appellate Trigger: Undocumented closure pattern

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A‑11: Administrative Hold Objection (Pre‑BYE)

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Administrative Hold Objection (Pre‑BYE)
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #9
Statute/Protocol Violated: VEC Proc. § 3.3.7; CLM‑LOG‑ACTIVE
Appellate Trigger: Safeguard against improper claim termination

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A‑8: Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Weekly Certification Submission & Confirmation
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #10
Statute/Protocol Violated: QSUB‑AXIS; VCX‑DSK‑015
Appellate Trigger: Unjustified denial post‑certification

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Needed: DOJ Special Counsel Demand Email

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. DOJ Special Counsel Demand Email
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #11
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 1983; DOJ ADA Complaint #536785‑LFD
Appellate Trigger: Cross‑agency coordination request must prompt DOJ action per CRQ‑001‑AUD.

Exhibit Appendix B-1: EEOC Charge Filed – Initial Intake

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. EEOC Charge Filed – Initial Intake
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #12
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9; ADA Title I
Appellate Trigger: Trigger of federal administrative jurisdiction

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-3: EEOC Mediation Session Conducted

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. EEOC Mediation Session Conducted
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #13
Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD-110 Ch. 2; ADA Enforcement Guidance
Appellate Trigger: Failed early resolution process

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-4: Employer Position Statement Submitted (Deficient)

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Employer Position Statement Submitted (Deficient)
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #14
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.15(c)
Appellate Trigger: Procedural defect and evidence suppression

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-5: Formal Objection to Employer Response Filed

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Formal Objection to Employer Response Filed
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #15
Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC Internal Guidance; Retaliation Digest No. 69
Appellate Trigger: Objection supports adverse inference

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-2: Deputy-Level VEC Decision Received

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Deputy-Level VEC Decision Received
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #16
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-619(a); UI Admin Rule 12
Appellate Trigger: Procedural defect in adjudication

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-1: VEC Appeals Hearing Conducted

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. VEC Appeals Hearing Conducted
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #17
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-620; VEC Hearing Procedure
Appellate Trigger: Established eligibility and credibility

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-1: Commission Final Decision (UI-145419-C)

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Commission Final Decision (UI-145419-C)
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #18
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; Final Adjudication
Appellate Trigger: Triggers VEC duty to pay immediately

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-5: Formal Objection and Compliance Demand Sent

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Formal Objection and Compliance Demand Sent
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #19
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-612; UI Appeals Compliance
Appellate Trigger: Invoked payment enforcement clause

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix A-6: Master Administrative Correction Filing

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Master Administrative Correction Filing
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #20
Statute/Protocol Violated: UI-25009642; Va. Code § 60.2-622
Appellate Trigger: Referenced HLD-ERR-MANUAL protocol

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix D-2: Cross-Agency Escalation Filing Sent

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Cross-Agency Escalation Filing Sent
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #21
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 1983; EEOC MD-110 Ch. 9; Va. Code § 60.2-633
Appellate Trigger: Triggered cross-agency complaint tracking

Exhibit Appendix B-21: Remediation Demand for Improper Response Deadline

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Remediation Demand for Improper Response Deadline
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #32
Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD‑110 § 6-8; 29 C.F.R. § 1601.15(c)
Appellate Trigger: Retaliatory timing and coercion risk

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-22: Submission: “Silence = Final Rebuttal” Email from EEOC

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Submission: “Silence = Final Rebuttal” Email from EEOC
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #33
Statute/Protocol Violated: 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A); EEOC Procedural Guide
Appellate Trigger: Evidence of coercive behavior

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-23: Formal MD‑110 and Procedural Violation Notice

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Formal MD‑110 and Procedural Violation Notice
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #34
Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD‑110 § 2-302; Forms 302/299A Required
Appellate Trigger: Systemic process violation

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-24: Show-Cause Demand Re: Investigator Perez

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Show-Cause Demand Re: Investigator Perez
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #35
Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD‑110 § 2-302
Appellate Trigger: Escalation of retaliation theory

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-25: Motion to Stay Final Determination Pending Appeal

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Motion to Stay Final Determination Pending Appeal
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #36
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.21
Appellate Trigger: Prevents premature closure

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-26: Formal Notice of Risk of Evidence Exclusion

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Formal Notice of Risk of Evidence Exclusion
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #37
Statute/Protocol Violated: 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A); FOIA-FSC-320
Appellate Trigger: Evidence integrity violation

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-27: Statement: Procedural Failure in Reconsideration

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Statement: Procedural Failure in Reconsideration
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #38
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.18(c)
Appellate Trigger: Unlawful closure

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-28: Supervisor Review Request – Rosa-Ramos

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Supervisor Review Request – Rosa-Ramos
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #39
Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD‑110 § 2-302
Appellate Trigger: Triggers supervisor liability

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix D-4: Cross-Agency Escalation Notice – DOJ, DOL, VEC

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Cross-Agency Escalation Notice – DOJ, DOL, VEC
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #40
Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC-DOJ-DOL MOU; 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appellate Trigger: Failure creates joint liability

Exhibit [Exhibit Ref]: [Description]

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. [Description]
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #[#]
Statute/Protocol Violated: [Statute]
Appellate Trigger: [Trigger]

Exhibit Appendix B-29: Notice of Adverse Inference Created by EEOC Conduct

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Notice of Adverse Inference Created by EEOC Conduct
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #41
Statute/Protocol Violated: 5 U.S.C. § 706; EEOC Digest No. 69
Appellate Trigger: Compounding procedural harm

Exhibit Appendix B-1: Initial EEOC Charge of Discrimination Filed

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Initial EEOC Charge of Discrimination Filed
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #32
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.9
Appellate Trigger: Charge initiation triggering federal process

Exhibit Appendix A-6: Formal Notice of ADA Accommodation Request

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Formal Notice of ADA Accommodation Request
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #33
Statute/Protocol Violated: ADA, 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)
Appellate Trigger: Interactive process demand issued

Exhibit Appendix B-3: Complaint of ADA Retaliation and Constructive Discharge

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Complaint of ADA Retaliation and Constructive Discharge
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #34
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203
Appellate Trigger: Temporal nexus with protected action

Exhibit Appendix C-4: Request for Leave Records & Time Entry Verification

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Request for Leave Records & Time Entry Verification
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #35
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1602.14; Va. Code § 60.2-633
Appellate Trigger: Factual conflict in leave usage and STD handling

Exhibit Appendix A-9: Payroll Discrepancies & STD Evidence Filed

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Payroll Discrepancies & STD Evidence Filed
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #36
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(4)
Appellate Trigger: Material deviation from standard payroll submission

Exhibit Appendix A-2: Submission of VEC Appeal Notification & Med Certs

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Submission of VEC Appeal Notification & Med Certs
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #37
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; VEC Manual § 3.3.5
Appellate Trigger: Properly filed reconsideration under statutory window

Exhibit Appendix B-5: Formal Addendum: Constructive Discharge Theory

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Formal Addendum: Constructive Discharge Theory
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #38
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1601.15
Appellate Trigger: Broadens basis of adverse employment action

Exhibit Appendix C-5: FOIA Request to EEOC for Internal Record & Interview Log

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. FOIA Request to EEOC for Internal Record & Interview Log
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #39
Statute/Protocol Violated: FOIA-FSC-320; 5 U.S.C. § 552
Appellate Trigger: Seeks procedural metadata and assignment validation

Exhibit Appendix D-1: Cross-Agency Coordination Demand to DOJ/DOL

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Cross-Agency Coordination Demand to DOJ/DOL
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #40
Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC-DOL-DOJ MOU; 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appellate Trigger: Establishes systemic pattern of failure

Exhibit Appendix A-7: Submission of Internal Ethics Complaints (HR records)

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Submission of Internal Ethics Complaints (HR records)
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #41
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1602.14; ADA Title I
Appellate Trigger: Reinforces hostile work environment pattern

Exhibit Appendix B-6: Formal ADA Failure-to-Accommodate Complaint

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Formal ADA Failure-to-Accommodate Complaint
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #52
Statute/Protocol Violated: ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(5)(A)
Appellate Trigger: Direct violation of interactive obligation

Exhibit Appendix A-6: Self-Certified Accommodation Request Submitted

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Self-Certified Accommodation Request Submitted
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #53
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o); B-APP-020
Appellate Trigger: Met threshold for protected request

Exhibit Appendix B-7: Performance Review Contradiction Evidence Filed

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Performance Review Contradiction Evidence Filed
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #54
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1602.14
Appellate Trigger: Evidence contradicts termination justification

Exhibit Appendix B-8: Visitor Witness Statement Affidavits Filed

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Visitor Witness Statement Affidavits Filed
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #55
Statute/Protocol Violated: Fed. R. Evid. 801(d); EEOC Evidence Rules
Appellate Trigger: Corroborates hostile conditions and management conduct

Exhibit Appendix B-9: Request for Early Resolution / Mediation Submitted

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Request for Early Resolution / Mediation Submitted
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #56
Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC Digest No. 48; 29 C.F.R. § 1601.24
Appellate Trigger: No mediator assigned or response provided

Exhibit Appendix B-10: Formal Demand for Reinstatement and Retraction of Warnings

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Formal Demand for Reinstatement and Retraction of Warnings
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #57
Statute/Protocol Violated: 42 U.S.C. § 12203(b)
Appellate Trigger: Employer failed to respond or acknowledge rights

Exhibit Appendix A-1: Filed VEC Hearing Packet – Full Public Record

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Filed VEC Hearing Packet – Full Public Record
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #58
Statute/Protocol Violated: Va. Code § 60.2-622; UI-145419-C
Appellate Trigger: Forms basis for VEC reversal on May 8, 2025

Exhibit Appendix B-11: Supplemental Email Chain from Azariah Workman Submitted

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Supplemental Email Chain from Azariah Workman Submitted
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #59
Statute/Protocol Violated: 29 C.F.R. § 1602.14
Appellate Trigger: Material contradiction with Cox’s position statement

Exhibit Appendix B-12: Demand for Sworn HR Witness Affidavits from Cox

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Demand for Sworn HR Witness Affidavits from Cox
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #60
Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC Manual § 2.3; 29 C.F.R. § 1601.15
Appellate Trigger: No affidavits returned or certified statements made

Exhibit Appendix B-13: Formal Notice Citing Improper EEOC Form Usage

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Formal Notice Citing Improper EEOC Form Usage
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #61
Statute/Protocol Violated: EEOC MD-110 § 6-8; Form 302 / 299A Required
Appellate Trigger: Violation of structural due process

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #MN
Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower
Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #45838
Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower
Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #Formal Letter (PDF/Gmail)
Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower
Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #Improper fallback to vacated decisions violates finality laws
Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower
Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #VEC attempted to fallback to deputy decisions that were voided by UI-25009642, violating Va. Code § 60.2-622.
Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower
Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #UI-25009642 (June 23, 2025)
Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower
Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #Triggers adverse inference under EEOC precedent and state law; delays deemed retaliatory
Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower
Appellate Trigger: Yes

Exhibit GmailLink🔗: Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14

Image of the Evidence:
[Insert scanned image or screenshot here]

Text of the Evidence:
[Paste or transcribe full text here]

Lined/Enumerated Version with Annotations:
  1. Subject:DoNotCloseTheseCases29CFR§1602.14
    Annotation: Explain relevance, contradiction, or statutory trigger.
Cross-References:
Cited in: Violation Index Table, Row #Yes
Statute/Protocol Violated: (RecordRetention)Whistleblower
Appellate Trigger: Yes